The Future Of Decentralization Politics In Indonesia
Abstract
Without much preparation, Indonesia in 2000 the new system replaced the previous centralized governance system and development planning with various decentralization programs. The reforms gave greater authority, political power, and financial resources directly to districts and cities, through the provinces. Strengths transferred include those who carry out various responsibilities in the fields of health, primary and secondary education, public works, environment, communication, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, and other economic sectors. At the same time, the government replaced the cash-based public finance system, a single-entry financial system with a modern double-entry accounting system that uses one treasury account; based on performance; and has transparent public cash management, strict expenditure and financial controls with performance indicators, computerized reporting, and a tightly scheduled audit system.
Downloads
References
Crook, R. &J. Manor (1998).Democracy and Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diprose, R. &U. Ukiwo (2008). Decentralisation and Conflict Management in Indonesia and Nigeria. Crise Working Paper No. 49. Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
Hadiz, V. R. (2005). Dinamika Kekuasaan: Ekonomi Politik Indonesia Pasca-Soeharto. Jakarta: LP3S.
Hanif, H. (2011). Demokrasi Prosedural dan Demokrasi Substantif. Modul Kuliah Pascasarjana Politik & Pemerintahan Fisipol, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Hidayat, S. (2007). “Shadow State? Bisnis dan Politik di Provinsi Banten” dalam H. S. Nordholt & G. van Klinken (eds)Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Hidayat, S. (2009). “Pilkada, Money Politics and the Dangers of Informal Governance Practices” dalam M. Erb & P. Sulistiyanto (eds) Deepening Democracy in Indonesia? Direct Elections for Local Leaders (Pilkada). Singapura: ISEAS Publishing.
Jaya, W. K. (2010). Kebijakan Desentralisasi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Ekonomi Kelembagaan. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Ilmu Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Kaho, J. R. (2012). Analisis Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Polgov.
Lay, C. (2013). Desentralisasi Asimetris: Sebuah Model Bagi Indonesia? Makalah pengantar Sidang Komite I DPD RI, Selasa 5 Maret 2013.
Manor, J. (2011). Perspectives on Decentralization. Working Paper No 3, The Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy (ICLD).
Nordholt, H. S. & G. van Klinken (2007).Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Rasyid, R. (2006). The Policy of Decentralization in The Policy of Decentralization in Indonesia.Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University: International Studies Program Working Paper 02-31 December 2002.
Robison, R. & V. R. Hadiz (2004). Reorganizing Power in Indonesia. London: RouledgeCurzon.
Rondinelli, D. A. (1990). Decentralization, Territorial Power and the State: A Critical Response. Sage: Development and Change Vol. 21, pp. 491-500.
Sholikin, A. (2018a). Otonomi Daerah dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam (Minyak Bumi) di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(1), 35–50.
Sholikin, A. (2018b). PERBEDAAN SIKAP POLITIK ELEKTORAL MUHAMMADIYAH ANTARA PUSAT DAN DAERAH. POLINTER, 3(2).
Solikhin, A. (2017). Menimbang Pentingnya Desentralisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 2(1).
Slater, D. (1990). Debating Decentralisation – A Reply to Rondinelli. SAGE: Development and Change, Vol. 21, pp. 501-512.
Seymour, R. & S. Turner (2002). Otonomi Daerah: Indonesia’s Decentralisation Experiment. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 4, Vol. 2,pp. 33-51.
van Klinken G. (2007). Communal Conflict and Decentralisation in Indonesia. Occasional Papers Series Number7, July 2007, The Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies(ACPACS).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
