Desentralisasi Asimetris, Alternatif Bagi Masa Depan Pembagian Kewenangan di Indonesia
Abstract
Decentralization, both asymmetrical and symmetrical, in Indonesia will continue to be a serious concern for the study of politics and government. Indonesia has distinctive characteristics that make a study of the pattern of relations between the center and the regions always trying to find a more ideal format. The third characteristic is geographical distribution, demographic distribution and economic distribution centered on Java (economics even based in Jakarta). The agreement made by Indonesia in the form of a unit made the pull relationship between the center and the regions filled with political and economic considerations. The granting of special autonomy to Aceh and Papua, which accompanies long separation from Indonesia shows the complexity of the problems of relations between the center and the regions.
Downloads
References
Diprose, R. &U. Ukiwo (2008). Decentralisation and Conflict Management in Indonesia and Nigeria. Crise Working Paper No. 49. Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
Hadiz, V. R. (2005). Dinamika Kekuasaan: Ekonomi Politik Indonesia Pasca-Soeharto. Jakarta: LP3S.
Hidayat, S. (2007). “Shadow State? Bisnis dan Politik di Provinsi Banten” dalam H. S. Nordholt & G. van Klinken (eds)Politik Lokal di Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Jaya, W. K. (2010). Kebijakan Desentralisasi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Ekonomi Kelembagaan. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Ilmu Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Kaho, J. R. (2012). Analisis Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Polgov.
Lay, C. (2013). Desentralisasi Asimetris: Sebuah Model Bagi Indonesia? Makalah pengantar Sidang Komite I DPD RI, Selasa 5 Maret 2013.
Manor, J. (2011). Perspectives on Decentralization. Working Paper No 3, The Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy (ICLD).
Rasyid, R. (2006). The Policy of Decentralization in The Policy of Decentralization in Indonesia.Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University: International Studies Program Working Paper 02-31 December 2002.
Robison, R. & V. R. Hadiz (2004). Reorganizing Power in Indonesia. London: RouledgeCurzon
Rondinelli, D. A. (1983). Implementing Decentralization Programmes In Asia: A Comparative Analysis. Public Administration and Development, Vol. 3, pp. 181-207.
Sholikin, A. (2018). Otonomi Daerah dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam (Minyak Bumi) di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(1), 35–50.
Solikhin, A. (2016). ISLAM, NEGARA, DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK ISLAM MINORITAS. Journal of Governance, 1(1).
Solikhin, A. (2017). Menimbang Pentingnya Desentralisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 2(1).
Slater, D. (1990). Debating Decentralisation – A Reply to Rondinelli. SAGE: Development and Change, Vol. 21, pp. 501-512.
Seymour, R. & S. Turner (2002). Otonomi Daerah: Indonesia’s Decentralisation Experiment. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 4, Vol. 2,pp. 33-51.
van Klinken G. (2007). Communal Conflict and Decentralisation in Indonesia. Occasional Papers Series Number7, July 2007, The Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies(ACPACS).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
