Urgensi Musyawarah-mufakat dalam Pemenuhan Hak dan Informasi Publik, Melihat Fenomena dari Sudut Pandang Demokrasi Deliberatif Jurgen Habermas
Keywords:
Deliberation-consensus, public rights and information, deliberative democracy
Abstract
This article tries to reveal community culture again through deliberation and consensus in public spaces which are starting to be displaced by virtual spaces. This loss of public space culture has an impact on the failure to fulfill basic citizen rights, namely the right to know public information. Jurgen Habermas' deliberative democracy opens up discussion and context efforts in the public space to educate the public so that they have access to information on issues of common life. Activities through this process can not only be a reference in forming joint policies, but can also be a training for the public to think rationally.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anderson, D. M., & Cornfield, M. (Eds. ). (2003). The civic web: Online politics and democratic values.
Bhakti, S. E. (2020). Ruang publik dan media sosial: partisipasi politik mahasiswa indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Media, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25139/jkm.v4i1.2376
Byron, M. (2017). Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. In Politics. Routledge., (pp. 361-382).
Calhoun, C. (Ed. ). (1993). Habermas and the public sphere. In MIT press.
Cohen, J. (1999). Reflections on Habermas on democracy. Ratio Juris, 12(4), 385-416.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
Dommett, K., & Verovšek, P. J. (2021). Promoting Democracy in the Digital Public Sphere: Applying Theoretical Ideals to Online Political Communication. Javnost - The Public, 28(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1955206
Eley, G. (1992). Culture, Britain, and Europe. Journal of British Studies, 31(4), 390–414.
Finlayson, J. G. (2005). Habermas: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? : a political-philosophical exchange. Verso.
Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretasi Kebudayaan. New York: Buku Dasar. Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (2004). State of the art of comparative political communication research. Comparing Political Communication, 325-43.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.
Habermas, J. (1986). The new obscurity: The crisis of the welfare state and the exhaustion of utopian energies: Translated by Phillip Jacobs. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 11(2), 1-18.
Habermas, J. (1989). Towards a communication‐concept of rational collective will‐formation. A thought‐experiment. Ratio Juris, 2(2), 144–154.
Hardiman, F. B. (2004a). Demokrasi Deliberatif: Model untuk Indonesia Pasca-Soeharto?. Majalah Basis Nomor, 11-12.
Hardiman, F. B. (2004b). Filsafat modern: dari Machiavelli sampai Nietzsche. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hardiman, F. B. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif. PT Kanisius.
Hohendahl, P., & Russian, P. (1974). Jürgen Habermas:" The Public Sphere"(1964). (3)(New German Critique), 45–48.
Jenkins, H., & Thorburn, D. (2003). Introduction: The digital revolution, the informed citizen, and the culture of democracy. Democracy and New Media, 1, 17.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Gotong Rojong: Beberapa Observasi Sosial-Antropologis Terhadap Praktek di Dua Desa di Jawa Tengah. Singapura: Penerbitan Equinox; 2009 (awalnya diterbitkan oleh Cornell Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1961).
Koentjaraningrat, R. M. (1967). De sociale wetenschappen in Indonesia na de tweede Wereldoorlog. Mens En Maatschappij, 42(6), 490-515.
Kurniawan, T. (2018). Simbolisme Dalam Pesta Dalok Suku Uud Danum: Perspektif Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur. Studia Philosophica et Theologica, 18(2), 179–197.
Owen, D., & Ashenden, S. (1999). Foucault contra Habermas: Recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory.
Pedersen, J. (2008). Habermas’ method: rational reconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38(4), 457-485.
Prasetyo, A. G. (2012). Menuju demokrasi rasional: Melacak pemikiran jürgen habermas tentang ruang publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(2), 169-185.
Priono, A. (2023). DINAMIKA DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF MELALUI MUSYAWARAHKALURAHAN (MUSKAL) DI KALURAHAN PATUK, KAPANEWONPATUK, KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL, DAERAH ISTIMEWAYOGYAKARTA.
Purnamawati, E. (2020). Perjalanan Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Solusi, 18(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v18i2.290
Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765-807.
Rehg, W. (2003). Habermas, argumentation theory, and science studies: Toward interdisciplinary cooperation. Informal Logic, 23(2).
Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. (2001). Postmodern social theory. In Handbook of sociological theory . Boston, MA: Springer US.
Santoso, Y. (2007). Ruang publik : sebuah kajian tentang kategori masyarakatborjuis / Jurgen Habermas. Kreasi Wacana.
Terry, P. R. (1997). Habermas and education: Knowledge, communication, discourse. Curriculum Studies, 5(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369700200019
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Adelman, L. (2020). (2020). Toleration and prejudice‐reduction: Two ways of improving intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 239–255.
Warner, M., & Calhoun, C. (1992). The mass public and the mass subject. American Literary Studies: A Methodological Reader, 243–263.
Zamzam, A. F. (2019). Deliberative Democracy as The Basis of Religious Tolerance. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores., VII, 1–154. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v28i1.1673
Bhakti, S. E. (2020). Ruang publik dan media sosial: partisipasi politik mahasiswa indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Media, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25139/jkm.v4i1.2376
Byron, M. (2017). Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. In Politics. Routledge., (pp. 361-382).
Calhoun, C. (Ed. ). (1993). Habermas and the public sphere. In MIT press.
Cohen, J. (1999). Reflections on Habermas on democracy. Ratio Juris, 12(4), 385-416.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
Dommett, K., & Verovšek, P. J. (2021). Promoting Democracy in the Digital Public Sphere: Applying Theoretical Ideals to Online Political Communication. Javnost - The Public, 28(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1955206
Eley, G. (1992). Culture, Britain, and Europe. Journal of British Studies, 31(4), 390–414.
Finlayson, J. G. (2005). Habermas: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? : a political-philosophical exchange. Verso.
Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretasi Kebudayaan. New York: Buku Dasar. Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (2004). State of the art of comparative political communication research. Comparing Political Communication, 325-43.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.
Habermas, J. (1986). The new obscurity: The crisis of the welfare state and the exhaustion of utopian energies: Translated by Phillip Jacobs. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 11(2), 1-18.
Habermas, J. (1989). Towards a communication‐concept of rational collective will‐formation. A thought‐experiment. Ratio Juris, 2(2), 144–154.
Hardiman, F. B. (2004a). Demokrasi Deliberatif: Model untuk Indonesia Pasca-Soeharto?. Majalah Basis Nomor, 11-12.
Hardiman, F. B. (2004b). Filsafat modern: dari Machiavelli sampai Nietzsche. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hardiman, F. B. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif. PT Kanisius.
Hohendahl, P., & Russian, P. (1974). Jürgen Habermas:" The Public Sphere"(1964). (3)(New German Critique), 45–48.
Jenkins, H., & Thorburn, D. (2003). Introduction: The digital revolution, the informed citizen, and the culture of democracy. Democracy and New Media, 1, 17.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Gotong Rojong: Beberapa Observasi Sosial-Antropologis Terhadap Praktek di Dua Desa di Jawa Tengah. Singapura: Penerbitan Equinox; 2009 (awalnya diterbitkan oleh Cornell Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1961).
Koentjaraningrat, R. M. (1967). De sociale wetenschappen in Indonesia na de tweede Wereldoorlog. Mens En Maatschappij, 42(6), 490-515.
Kurniawan, T. (2018). Simbolisme Dalam Pesta Dalok Suku Uud Danum: Perspektif Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur. Studia Philosophica et Theologica, 18(2), 179–197.
Owen, D., & Ashenden, S. (1999). Foucault contra Habermas: Recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory.
Pedersen, J. (2008). Habermas’ method: rational reconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38(4), 457-485.
Prasetyo, A. G. (2012). Menuju demokrasi rasional: Melacak pemikiran jürgen habermas tentang ruang publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(2), 169-185.
Priono, A. (2023). DINAMIKA DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF MELALUI MUSYAWARAHKALURAHAN (MUSKAL) DI KALURAHAN PATUK, KAPANEWONPATUK, KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL, DAERAH ISTIMEWAYOGYAKARTA.
Purnamawati, E. (2020). Perjalanan Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Solusi, 18(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v18i2.290
Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765-807.
Rehg, W. (2003). Habermas, argumentation theory, and science studies: Toward interdisciplinary cooperation. Informal Logic, 23(2).
Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. (2001). Postmodern social theory. In Handbook of sociological theory . Boston, MA: Springer US.
Santoso, Y. (2007). Ruang publik : sebuah kajian tentang kategori masyarakatborjuis / Jurgen Habermas. Kreasi Wacana.
Terry, P. R. (1997). Habermas and education: Knowledge, communication, discourse. Curriculum Studies, 5(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369700200019
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Adelman, L. (2020). (2020). Toleration and prejudice‐reduction: Two ways of improving intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 239–255.
Warner, M., & Calhoun, C. (1992). The mass public and the mass subject. American Literary Studies: A Methodological Reader, 243–263.
Zamzam, A. F. (2019). Deliberative Democracy as The Basis of Religious Tolerance. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores., VII, 1–154. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v28i1.1673
Published
2023-12-31
How to Cite
Zamzam, A., Surur, M., Mabruri, M., Rosyid, H., & Azzahra, N. (2023). Urgensi Musyawarah-mufakat dalam Pemenuhan Hak dan Informasi Publik, Melihat Fenomena dari Sudut Pandang Demokrasi Deliberatif Jurgen Habermas. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(03), 536-550. Retrieved from http://www.e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/MADANI/article/view/6271
Section
Articles
